What is Turabian Style?
Modern day language has been revolutionized by the use of Turabian style. From its roots in the Chicago Manual of Style, this guide has become standard use for students and professors today. With a hard slant towards academia, the Turabian style has become one of the most widely used methods of documentation.
Perhaps one of the most important features of the Turabian Style is the Turabian manual itself. With its simple, straightforward language and comprehensive research paper guide, the manual is a universal resource for the modern writer. In fact, the Turabian manual guides the student through the entire process of writing, from start to finish.
Critically Acclaimed Style
Turabian style has also garnered acclaim as one of the best methods of documentation. Every solid academic paper needs sources, and Turabian style has one of the best methods of citation. In fact, the Turabian style has two alternatives for implementing documentation, to better suit the needs of the writer.
The primary function of the Turabian format is to give guidelines for footnote and/or endnote documentation, often required by historians and some humanities writers. More current versions of this manuscript format have been reprinted by the University of Chicago Press under the new title of The Chicago Manual of Style.
Arrange the items on your reference list alphabetically by author, interfiling books, articles, etc.
- Indent the second and following lines 5 spaces.
- If you are using a typewriter and cannot use italics, then use underlining.
- If no author is given, start with the title and then the date.
Difference between Chicago and Turabian styles:
Chicago is the style manual of choice for history and some other disciplines. Turabian, a simplified guide to the Chicago Manual of Style, is a popular choice at many undergraduate institutions regardless of discipline. Turabian and Chicago offer two documentation systems:
1) footnote/bibliography and
2) parenthetical reference/reference list.
The systems are quite different, one more closely resembling MLA, and the other similar to APA. Be careful not to mix the two.
|
